refnotes:bib

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
refnotes:bib [2023/06/28 19:27] – epsatiseprefnotes:bib [2023/06/28 19:39] (current) – epsatisep
Line 286: Line 286:
  abstract = { Although kerbside recycling participation rates have been well studied, little consideration has been paid to dense housing, especially high-rise estates, even though such areas have particularly low participation rates. Because such areas present infrastructural difficulties for recyclates storage and collections, reduced service often results. Nevertheless, solutions still emphasise communication strategies and householder responsibility over adequate infrastructural provision. This paper draws together three empirically based analyses focusing on the improvement of waste collection procedures and infrastructural design for high- and low-rise dense housing. Two sites were studied: an inner London estate and Portsmouth. Both sites have minimal storage space either within the home or in external private, communal or public areas. Both areas have high churn rates. Analysis of the findings suggests that consideration needs to be given to several factors: social, architectural, technological, infrastructural and organisational. Communication strategies need to be simple and consistent and need to acknowledge non-Anglophone residents. Spatial ownership needs to be clearly demarcated and maintained. Solutions must be tailored to existing exigencies of the built environment (such as poor vehicular access) and need to include broader infrastructural factors such as functioning lifts and convenient, safe storage facilities. New-build is better placed to integrate a flexible collection infrastructure. However, pressure to increase housing density is providing a continuing challenge to design appropriate storage and collection infrastructures.}  abstract = { Although kerbside recycling participation rates have been well studied, little consideration has been paid to dense housing, especially high-rise estates, even though such areas have particularly low participation rates. Because such areas present infrastructural difficulties for recyclates storage and collections, reduced service often results. Nevertheless, solutions still emphasise communication strategies and householder responsibility over adequate infrastructural provision. This paper draws together three empirically based analyses focusing on the improvement of waste collection procedures and infrastructural design for high- and low-rise dense housing. Two sites were studied: an inner London estate and Portsmouth. Both sites have minimal storage space either within the home or in external private, communal or public areas. Both areas have high churn rates. Analysis of the findings suggests that consideration needs to be given to several factors: social, architectural, technological, infrastructural and organisational. Communication strategies need to be simple and consistent and need to acknowledge non-Anglophone residents. Spatial ownership needs to be clearly demarcated and maintained. Solutions must be tailored to existing exigencies of the built environment (such as poor vehicular access) and need to include broader infrastructural factors such as functioning lifts and convenient, safe storage facilities. New-build is better placed to integrate a flexible collection infrastructure. However, pressure to increase housing density is providing a continuing challenge to design appropriate storage and collection infrastructures.}
 } }
- + 
 +@article{Resources2016, 
 + title = {Will they recycle? Design and implementation of eco-feedback technology to promote on-the-go recycling in a university environment}, 
 + journal = {Resources, Conservation and Recycling}, 
 + volume = {114}, 
 + pages = {72-79}, 
 + year = {2016}, 
 + issn = {0921-3449}, 
 + doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.024}, 
 + url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916301616}, 
 + author = {Eliana Mozo-Reyes and Jenna R. Jambeck and Patricia Reeves and Kyle Johnsen}, 
 + keywords = {Recycling, Solid waste management, Recycle bin, Human-computer interaction}, 
 + abstract = {Recycling rates have plateaued and recycling in public spaces has been targeted as a component that can help increase overall recycling rates. Eco-feedback technology and environmental psychology were combined to study recycling in a semi-public space in multiple social environments. A low-cost, low-energy electronic recycling bin design (WeRecycle bin) uses human-computer interaction and social principles to provide behavior-changing eco-feedback. Using mixed-methods research, we tested the WeRecycle bin in three different experiments by varying social settings and time of exposure, documenting impacts for public recycling. Results show that simple low-energy, low-cost eco-feedback technology resulted in statistically significant increases in recycling activity and can be an important tool in the promotion of recycling activity outside the home.} 
 +} 
 @book{Handbuch2018, @book{Handbuch2018,
   title = "Handbuch Littering",   title = "Handbuch Littering",
Line 304: Line 318:
 } }
    
-@MISC{unitednation, +@MISC{unitednations, 
-   author = "{United Nation}",+   author = "{United Nations}",
    title   = "{Goals - Education}",    title   = "{Goals - Education}",
    url     = {https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4},    url     = {https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4},
Line 313: Line 327:
 } }
    
-@article{BOUWMA2018213,+@article{Bouwma2018,
 title = {Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies}, title = {Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies},
 journal = {Ecosystem Services}, journal = {Ecosystem Services},
Line 328: Line 342:
 } }
    
-@MISC{dametis,+@MISC{Dametis,
    author = {Dametis},    author = {Dametis},
    title   = "{ISO 50001-Standard: Definition und Vorteile}",    title   = "{ISO 50001-Standard: Definition und Vorteile}",
Line 337: Line 351:
 } }
    
-@article{ILGIN2010563,+@article{Ilgin2010,
 title = {Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art}, title = {Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art},
 journal = {Journal of Environmental Management}, journal = {Journal of Environmental Management},
  • refnotes/bib.1687976879.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2023/06/28 19:27
  • by epsatisep